Penile implant infection prevention part 1: what is fact and what is fiction? Wilson's Workshop #9.
Author | |
---|---|
Abstract |
:
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infections are undeniably devastating for patient and surgeon alike. While less common in this modern era, the landscape of prosthesis infection is shifting. Continued examination of risk factors for infection and re-evaluation of common practices remain critical should we aim to advance the field. Quality research on this topic is limited by several factors, among which small sample size and lack of coordinated effort pose the most precarious of challenges. Nonetheless, careful analysis of available data in conjuncture with judicious utilization of established research from other prosthetic fields can help us better grasp the issue at hand. In this review, we aim to do exactly that-to examine available evidence in an effort to discern fact from fiction. In this first part of the three part series, we aim to summarize our understanding of the pathogenesis behind prosthesis infections, explore known preoperative risk factors, and discuss intraoperative considerations for infection prevention. In the second part of this series, we will examine the game changing effect of infection retardant implant coatings. Part three of the series details postoperative prevention strategies, reviews salvage techniques, and discusses additional key considerations. |
Year of Publication |
:
2020
|
Journal |
:
International journal of impotence research
|
Volume |
:
33
|
Issue |
:
8
|
Number of Pages |
:
785-792
|
ISSN Number |
:
0955-9930
|
URL |
:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0326-5
|
DOI |
:
10.1038/s41443-020-0326-5
|
Short Title |
:
Int J Impot Res
|
Download citation |