Background: Administrative health data, such as the hospital Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), can potentially be used to identify patients with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction (NTSCD). Algorithms utilizing administrative health data for this purpose should be validated before clinical use. Objective: To validate an algorithm designed to identify patients with NTSCD through DAD. Method: DAD between 2006 and 2016 for Southern Alberta in Canada were obtained through Alberta Health Services. Cases of NTSCD were identified using the algorithm designed by the research team. These were then validated by chart review using electronic medical records where possible and paper records where electronic records were unavailable. Measures of diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Results: Two hundred and eighty cases were identified to have both the administrative codes for neurological impairments and NTSCD etiology. Twenty-eight cases were excluded from analysis as 5 had inadequate medical record information, 17 had traumatic spinal cord injury, and 6 were considered "other" non-spinal cord conditions. Measures of diagnostic accuracy that were computed were sensitivity 97% (95% CI, 94%-98%), specificity 60% (95% CI, 47%-73%), positive predictive value (PPV) 92% (95% CI, 88%-95%), and negative predictive value (NPV) 80% (95% CI, 65%-90%). The most prevalent etiologies were degenerative (36.9%), infection (19.0%), oncology malignant (15.1%), and vascular (10.3%). Conclusion: Our algorithm has high sensitivity and PPV and satisfactory specificity and NPV for the identification of persons with NTSCD using DAD, though the limitations for using this method should be recognized.